In a letter to Kelu Chao, the head of the United States World Media Organization (USAGM), a number of Republicans in the US Congress have asked her to explain why she was re-hired by the VOA. The deputies demanded a list of those who appointed Setareh Derakhshesh to the job.<\/p>\n
In the letter, dated Wednesday, October 27, Michael McCaul, James Comer, John Curtis, Scott Perry, Guy Reschenthaler, Lee Zeldin and Jeoff Duncan asked Chao, why despite the accusations leveled at Setareh Derakhshesh on “financial exploitation” and “distortion of information” that led to her dismissal, she has been re-employed?<\/p>\n
The Congress Foreign Relations Committee contacted officials from the Sorbonne University in France, as well as the Higher Education Office of the French Embassy.\u00a0\u00a0Finally, they confirmed that the document she presented to the USAGM as a higher education degree was not a university degree, but only a confirmation of the courses he had taken at home.\u00a0\u00a0The Sorbonne University in France has confirmed that Derakhshesh has not received any doctoral degree from this university.<\/p>\n
In another part of the letter, the delegates of the Congress questioned the “honesty”, “competence” and “comprehensiveness” of the investigation into Setareh Derakhshesh and emphasized that there was no choice but to have the necessary transparency and cooperation from the French authorities in this case.\u00a0\u00a0Understanding the behind-the-scenes facts has been hampered by the fact that the illegal actions of the people involved in the case have not been exposed.<\/p>\n
“Letting fake or distorted credentials to get a job is a crime,” the letter said.\u00a0\u00a0She has presented herself on the “Iranian women’s movement from constitutionalism to the Islamic Revolution,” but follow-up shows she does not have a doctorate from the Sorbonne, and evidence shows that what she presented is fake, and the Sorbonne’s judicial office is investigating whether she did Wrote a thesis or not!<\/p>\n
The House Foreign Affairs Committee tried five times to get the results of the investigation into the Setareh Derakhshesh, but failed.\u00a0\u00a0In the end, the report they received was full of contradictions.<\/p>\n
The deputies demanded that it be announced who and in what process decided to re-hire Setareh Derakhshesh on VOA, as the US World Media Organization investigated her in 2020, which eventually led to the termination of Derakhshesh\u2019s contract with VOA.<\/p>\n
There were several reasons for the termination of the contract, including “distortion of personal information” and “misuse of financial resources”. However, the Recruitment Committee (USAGM) decided to hire her again in early February 2020!<\/p>\n
The recruitment committee, in justifying its decision to re-hire Derakhshesh, claimed that the initial investigation into her was incomplete and assured that she would have no problem re-hiring her, after which a more detailed and thorough investigation into the allegations against Derakhshesh would be conducted.<\/p>\n
The letter from the delegates to Kelu Chao emphasizes that there are serious problems in the second phase of the investigation into the status of Setareh Derakhshesh, including that the investigation is entrusted to exactly the same people who conducted the first phase of the investigation.\u00a0\u00a0Incidentally, an examination of the content of the report of the second phase of the investigation shows the extent to which the second report is incomplete and has substantial omissions.<\/p>\n
The signatories to the letter stressed that “the very brief explanations provided in this report show that it is merely general and lacks thematic coherence, and that it has many shortcomings compared to what led to the removal of Derakhshesh in the 2020 report.”<\/p>\n
On the other hand, the report does not provide any reliable information on the role of Michael Peck, former director of the United States Media Organization.<\/p>\n
This issue is currently being pursued through the Judiciary Office of the Sorbonne University.<\/p>\n
“Our impression is that you [Kelu Chao] played a role in her re-employment with VOA because of your personal relationship with Setareh Derakhshesh,” seven members of Congress wrote in the letter.<\/p>\n
The delegates also demanded that the correspondence from several directors of the United States World Media Organization and VOA be provided on specific dates to investigate the details of this suspicious recruitment.<\/p>\n"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a letter to Kelu Chao, the head of the United States World Media Organization (USAGM), a number of Republicans in the US Congress have asked her to explain why she was re-hired by the VOA. The deputies demanded a list of those who appointed Setareh Derakhshesh to the job. In the letter, dated Wednesday, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":794,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[114],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-politics"],"amp_enabled":true,"x_categories":"Politics","x_tags":"","x_featured_media":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Dd-S4ucVwAAA_MS-150x150.jpg","x_featured_media_medium":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Dd-S4ucVwAAA_MS-300x169.jpg","x_featured_media_large":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Dd-S4ucVwAAA_MS.jpg","x_featured_media_original":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Dd-S4ucVwAAA_MS.jpg","x_date":"10\/31\/2021","x_author":"Rezaei","x_gravatar":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c61747d104c911c99a4f1b01be691b6cd39100217a3d0020b68509bb16a8c9f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","x_metadata":{"wds_primary_category":"114","_last_editor_used_jetpack":"classic-editor","_wds_readability":{"score":0,"raw_score":false,"is_readable":false,"error":"No content to check"},"_wds_analysis":{"errors":{"wds-checks::focus":"There are no focus keywords","wds-checks::title_length":"Your SEO title is too long","wds-checks::checks":"We encountered an error fetching your content"},"percentage":79,"checks":{"focus":{"status":false,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"In order to give your content the best possible chance to be discovered, it is best to select some focus keywords or key phrases, to give it some context.","more_info":"Selecting focus keywords helps describe what your content is about.","status_msg":"There are no focus keywords"},"focus_stopwords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"You kept the focus keywords of your article to the point, way to go!","more_info":"Stop words are words which can be considered insignificant in a search query, either because they are way too common, or because they do not convey much information. Such words are often filtered out from a search query. Ideally, you will want such words to not be a part of your article focus.","status_msg":"Focus to the point"},"title_keywords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"You've got your focus keyword(s) in the SEO title meaning it has the best chance of matching what users are searching for first up - nice work.","more_info":"It's considered good practice to try to include your focus keyword(s) in the SEO title of a page because this is what people looking for the article are likely searching for. The higher chance of a keyword match, the greater the chance that your article will be found higher up in search results. Whilst it's recommended to try and get these words in, don't sacrifice readability and the quality of the SEO title just to rank higher - people may not want to click on it if it doesn't read well.","status_msg":"The SEO title contains your focus keyword(s)"},"title_length":{"status":false,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"Your SEO title is 109 characters which is greater than the recommended 65 characters. Best practice is between 50 and 65 characters, with 60 being the sweet spot.","more_info":"Your SEO title is the most important element because it is what users will see in search engine results. You'll want to make sure that you have your focus keywords in there, that it's a nice length, and that people will want to click on it. Best practices suggest keeping your titles between 50 and 65 characters including spaces, though in some cases 60 is the sweetspot. The length is important both for SEO ranking but also how your title will show up in search engines - long titles will be cut off visually and look bad. Unfortunately there isn't a rule book for SEO titles, just remember to make your title great for SEO but also (most importantly) readable and enticing for potential visitors to click on.","status_msg":"Your SEO title is too long"},"metadesc_keywords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"The focus keyword for this article appears in the SEO description which means it has a better chance of matching what your visitors will search for, brilliant!","more_info":"It's considered good practice to try to include your focus keyword(s) in the SEO description of your pages, because this is what people looking for the article are likely searching for. The higher chance of a keyword match, the higher chance your article will be found higher up in search results. Remember this is your chance to give a potential visitor a quick peek into what's inside your article. If they like what they read they'll click on your link.","status_msg":"The SEO description contains your focus keywords"},"metadesc_length":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"Your SEO description is a good length. Having an SEO description that is either too long or too short can harm your chances of ranking highly for this article.","more_info":"We recommend keeping your meta descriptions between 135 and 300 characters (including spaces). Doing so achieves a nice balance between populating your description with keywords to rank highly in search engines, and also keeping it to a readable length that won't be cut off in search engine results. Unfortunately there isn't a rule book for SEO meta descriptions, just remember to make your description great for SEO, but also (most importantly) readable and enticing for potential visitors to click on.","status_msg":"Your meta description is a good length"},"slug_keywords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"You've got your focus keywords in the page slug which can help your page rank as you have a higher chance of matching search terms, and Google does index your page URL, great stuff!","more_info":"The page URL you use for this post will be visible in search engine results, so it's important to also include words that the searcher is looking for (your focus keywords). It's debatable whether keywords in the slug are of any real search engine ranking benefit. One could assume that because the slug does get indexed, the algorithm may favour slugs more closely aligned with the topic being searched.","status_msg":"You've used your focus keyword in the page URL"},"keywords_used":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"Focus keywords are intended to be unique so you're less likely to write duplicate content. Consider changing the focus keywords to something unique.","more_info":"\t\tWhilst duplicate content isn't technically penalized it presents three rather niggly issues for search engines:\t\t