The New York Times published for the first time details of Mossad’s operation to oust Fakhrizadeh, showing that the automatic weapons and remote control used in the operation had been upgraded with artificial intelligence technology, and that officials in President Trump’s administration were informed during the operation.<\/p>\n
The New York Times reports that officials in President Trump’s administration have been informed of the operation, including former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former CIA Director Gina Haspel. Following President Trump’s departure from the BJP in late February 2019, Cohen presented a list of potential operations to the United States, including the physical removal of Fakhrizadeh. Mossad has been monitoring Fakhrizadeh since 2007.<\/p>\n
The New York Times writes: \u201cIranian agents working for the Mossad parked a blue Nissan pickup truck on the side of the road that connected Absard to the main highway.\u00a0\u00a0The point was a slight elevation with a view of approaching vehicles. Hidden Under tarpaulins and decoy construction materials to camouflage the van, in the truck bed was a 7.62 mm sniper machine gun.\u00a0\u00a0At around 1 p.m., the task force received a signal that Fakhrizadeh, his wife, and a group of his armed bodyguards were about to leave Absard in the cars that escorted him.\u00a0\u00a0The operator, who was a skilled sniper, positioned himself, prepared the gun, and gently touched the trigger.\u00a0\u00a0He was by no means near Absard, however. The sniper was peering at a computer screen in an undisclosed location thousands of miles away. The entire task force had already left Iran by then.\u201d<\/p>\n
The report states: “In this operation, advanced computer sniper technology with artificial intelligence and multi-camera observation via satellite was used for the first time, whose weapon was capable of firing 600 bullets per minute.” Unlike drones, this robotic weapon did not attract any attention in the sky.\u201d<\/p>\n
The New York Times went on to give more details about the automatic weapon and wrote: \u201cIsrael chose a special model of a Belgian-made FN MAG machine gun attached to an advanced robotic apparatus, according to an intelligence official familiar with the plot. The official said the system was not unlike the off-the-rack Sentinel 20 manufactured by the Spanish defense contractor Escribano.<\/p>\n
But the machine gun, the robot, its components and accessories together weigh about a ton. So the equipment was broken down into its smallest possible parts and smuggled into the country piece by piece, in various ways, routes and times, then secretly reassembled in Iran.\u201d<\/p>\n
The report added: \u201cThe robot was built to fit in the bed of a Zamyad pickup, a common model in Iran. Cameras pointing in multiple directions were mounted on the truck to give the command room a full picture not just of the target and his security detail, but of the surrounding environment. Finally, the truck was packed with explosives so it could be blown to bits after the kill, destroying all evidence. There were further complications in firing the weapon. A machine gun mounted on a truck, even a parked one, will shake after each shot\u2019s recoil, changing the trajectory of subsequent bullets.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The New York Times continues: “Also, even though the computer communicated with the control room via satellite, sending data at the speed of light, there would be a slight delay: What the operator saw on the screen was already a moment old, and adjusting the aim to compensate would take another moment,\u00a0<\/p>\n
all while Mr. Fakhrizadeh\u2019s car was in motion.<\/p>\n
The time it took for the camera images to reach the sniper and for the sniper\u2019s response to reach the machine gun, not including his reaction time, was estimated to be 1.6 seconds, enough of a lag for the best-aimed shot to go astray. The A.I. was programmed to compensate for the delay, the shake and the car\u2019s speed.\u201d<\/p>\n
The New York Times also wrote: \u201cAnother challenge was to determine in real time that it was Mr. Fakhrizadeh driving the car and not one of his children, his wife or a bodyguard.\u201d The report continued: \u201cThe solution was to station a fake disabled car, resting on a jack with a wheel missing, at a junction on the main road where vehicles heading for Absard had to make a U-turn, some three quarters of a mile from the kill zone. That vehicle contained another camera. The blue Zamyad pickup was parked next to Imam Khomeini Boulevard. Investigators later found that security cameras on the road had been disabled.\u201d<\/p>\n
In another part of its report, the New York Times refers to the final part of the operation by providing other details of the operation that is related to the removal of Fakhrizadeh and writes: \u201cThe blue Zamyad exploded.<\/p>\n
That was the only part of the operation that did not go as planned. The explosion was intended to rip the robot to shreds so the Iranians could not piece together what had happened. Instead, most of the equipment was hurled into the air and then fell to the ground, damaged beyond repair but largely intact. The Revolutionary Guards\u2019 assessment \u2014 that the attack was carried out by a remote-controlled machine gun \u201cequipped with an intelligent satellite system\u201d using artificial intelligence \u2014 was correct.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The New York Times published for the first time details of Mossad’s operation to oust Fakhrizadeh, showing that the automatic weapons and remote control used in the operation had been upgraded with artificial intelligence technology, and that officials in President Trump’s administration were informed during the operation. The New York Times reports that officials in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[119],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-world"],"amp_enabled":true,"x_categories":"World","x_tags":"","x_featured_media":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/download-150x150.jpg","x_featured_media_medium":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/download.jpg","x_featured_media_large":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/download.jpg","x_featured_media_original":"https:\/\/iraniancongress.news\/-\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/download.jpg","x_date":"09\/18\/2021","x_author":"Rezaei","x_gravatar":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8c61747d104c911c99a4f1b01be691b6cd39100217a3d0020b68509bb16a8c9f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","x_metadata":{"wds_primary_category":"119","_last_editor_used_jetpack":"classic-editor","_wds_readability":{"score":46.457540345449871210803394205868244171142578125,"raw_score":46.457540345449871210803394205868244171142578125,"is_readable":false,"error":false},"_wds_analysis":{"errors":{"wds-checks::focus":"There are no focus keywords","wds-checks::title_length":"Your SEO title is too long","wds-checks::imgalts_keywords":"You haven't added any images","wds-checks::subheadings_keywords":"You don't have any subheadings"},"percentage":72,"checks":{"focus":{"status":false,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"In order to give your content the best possible chance to be discovered, it is best to select some focus keywords or key phrases, to give it some context.","more_info":"Selecting focus keywords helps describe what your content is about.","status_msg":"There are no focus keywords"},"focus_stopwords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"You kept the focus keywords of your article to the point, way to go!","more_info":"Stop words are words which can be considered insignificant in a search query, either because they are way too common, or because they do not convey much information. Such words are often filtered out from a search query. Ideally, you will want such words to not be a part of your article focus.","status_msg":"Focus to the point"},"title_keywords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"You've got your focus keyword(s) in the SEO title meaning it has the best chance of matching what users are searching for first up - nice work.","more_info":"It's considered good practice to try to include your focus keyword(s) in the SEO title of a page because this is what people looking for the article are likely searching for. The higher chance of a keyword match, the greater the chance that your article will be found higher up in search results. Whilst it's recommended to try and get these words in, don't sacrifice readability and the quality of the SEO title just to rank higher - people may not want to click on it if it doesn't read well.","status_msg":"The SEO title contains your focus keyword(s)"},"title_length":{"status":false,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"Your SEO title is 99 characters which is greater than the recommended 65 characters. Best practice is between 50 and 65 characters, with 60 being the sweet spot.","more_info":"Your SEO title is the most important element because it is what users will see in search engine results. You'll want to make sure that you have your focus keywords in there, that it's a nice length, and that people will want to click on it. Best practices suggest keeping your titles between 50 and 65 characters including spaces, though in some cases 60 is the sweetspot. The length is important both for SEO ranking but also how your title will show up in search engines - long titles will be cut off visually and look bad. Unfortunately there isn't a rule book for SEO titles, just remember to make your title great for SEO but also (most importantly) readable and enticing for potential visitors to click on.","status_msg":"Your SEO title is too long"},"metadesc_keywords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"The focus keyword for this article appears in the SEO description which means it has a better chance of matching what your visitors will search for, brilliant!","more_info":"It's considered good practice to try to include your focus keyword(s) in the SEO description of your pages, because this is what people looking for the article are likely searching for. The higher chance of a keyword match, the higher chance your article will be found higher up in search results. Remember this is your chance to give a potential visitor a quick peek into what's inside your article. If they like what they read they'll click on your link.","status_msg":"The SEO description contains your focus keywords"},"metadesc_length":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"Your SEO description is a good length. Having an SEO description that is either too long or too short can harm your chances of ranking highly for this article.","more_info":"We recommend keeping your meta descriptions between 135 and 300 characters (including spaces). Doing so achieves a nice balance between populating your description with keywords to rank highly in search engines, and also keeping it to a readable length that won't be cut off in search engine results. Unfortunately there isn't a rule book for SEO meta descriptions, just remember to make your description great for SEO, but also (most importantly) readable and enticing for potential visitors to click on.","status_msg":"Your meta description is a good length"},"slug_keywords":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"You've got your focus keywords in the page slug which can help your page rank as you have a higher chance of matching search terms, and Google does index your page URL, great stuff!","more_info":"The page URL you use for this post will be visible in search engine results, so it's important to also include words that the searcher is looking for (your focus keywords). It's debatable whether keywords in the slug are of any real search engine ranking benefit. One could assume that because the slug does get indexed, the algorithm may favour slugs more closely aligned with the topic being searched.","status_msg":"You've used your focus keyword in the page URL"},"keywords_used":{"status":true,"ignored":false,"recommendation":"Focus keywords are intended to be unique so you're less likely to write duplicate content. Consider changing the focus keywords to something unique.","more_info":"\t\tWhilst duplicate content isn't technically penalized it presents three rather niggly issues for search engines:\t\t